What do you think of when you hear the words: Tiger Woods? Cheater, liar, sub par husband, worthless. In the same breath, some may think: world’s top golfer, Blackasian, Frosted Flakes. Regardless of what light you see Tiger Woods, we crucified him because of his infidelity. With eight alleged mistresses, Tiger Woods was the topic of everyone’s conversation for months after the Dec. 2009 revelation.
Charlie Sheen is in a totally different class, yet to me, all the same. Recordings of his spousal abuse, racist remarks, and drug abuse were all released in a massive media attack over the past weeks. What is the difference between the way we have responded to Charlie Sheen and Tiger Woods? It seems to me like we have glorified Charlie Sheen and chewed Tiger Woods up with a mouthful of blood.
I cannot presume the underlying reason for the contrasting treatment of these two very similar men is due to something like race. Within several weeks of all the drama surrounding Charlie Sheen being publicized, he joined twitter. After some controversial interviews, Charlie Sheen’s followers jumped from 0 to over 2 million. He has only tweeted 95 times as of now. Within weeks of Tiger Woods’ drama, he lost endorsements (as did Sheen), but his name left a bad taste in many of our mouths, more so than Sheen. I have heard many instances of Charlie Sheen quotes, all said in good humor.
Do we receive Charlie Sheen better because of his nonchalant attitude towards the issues surrounding his name? Is personality the prime factor here? Do we celebrate Sheen in a more light-hearted manner because we view him as “cool?” Is the issue here race? I will ponder some more on this.